|
John A. Broadus
Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed he thy name. Matthew 6:9
The prayer which thus
begins, which for many ages has been called among Christians "the Lord's
Prayer," is above all eulogium for its sweetness. No wonder this is so! For our Lord
presents it as a specimen, as a model of prayer. He said, "When ye pray, use not vain
repetitions, as the heathen do: for they think that they shall be heard for their much
speaking," saying over the same thing a thousand times. "Be ye not therefore
like unto them: for your Father knoweth what things ye have need of, before ye ask
him." Thus then do ye pray-this way and not with vain repetitions, not
with much speaking, thus do ye pray! He gives it as a sample, as a model. So on a
later occasion, recorded in the 11th Chapter of Luke-probably a long time after this, most
likely in quite another part of the country, certainly on a later occasion-our Lord was
praying himself, and when he ceased, the disciples asked him "Teach us to pray"
and he said "When ye pray, say:" and then he gave them substantially the same
prayer as the one here before us.
Now it very naturally occurs to many persons that our Lord has given this as a form of
prayer; that when we pray we ought always to say these words. I do not object to using
these words whenever anyone thinks them appropriate, that they express his sentiments; but
it is very certain that our Lord did not give this as a form of prayer. If you will notice
a moment I shall prove it. On the second occasion the prayer is very different from that
which we here read. Even in the common text, it is different in several expressions; but
if you will take any revised text as furnished by any competent scholar of the day, you
will find that the prayer on that occasion is quite different. Allow me to repeat it as it
is there. You all know the words as they occur here but on that second occasion this is
what he said: "Father, Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Give us day by day our
daily bread. And forgive us our sins; for we also forgive every one that is indebted to
us. And bring us not into temptation."
Now you observe that I have omitted several phrases of the familiar prayer given here in
the Sermon on the Mount. If you look a little closely you notice that nothing of essential
importance, no distinctive idea, has been omitted here. Instead of "Our Father which
art in heaven," you have simply "Father." You have lost some pleasing
words, but you have really lost no part of the essential thought. When after the petition
"Thy kingdom come," you find wanting the words "Thy will be done on earth
as it is in heaven," you observe in a moment that although a pleasing expression has
been expunged, it is involved in the preceding petition, "Thy kingdom come;" for
when God's reign on earth is fully come, his will must of necessity be done on earth as in
heaven. And so, when after the prayer "Bring us not into temptation," you miss
the words "But deliver us from evil," you observe that they do, at most, but
express the other side of the same truth; something that is implied in the words that
remain.
On that second occasion then, our Lord has omitted no idea that belongs to the prayer. It
is substantially the very same, but in form it is exceedingly different. Is not there the
proof at once that he did not intend this as a form of prayer? If he did so intend, why in
the world should he not have repeated his form correctly on the second occasion? No: he
intended it not as a form of prayer, that precisely these words should be used, but as an
example, "Thus do ye pray." Avoid the vain repetitions and much speaking of the
heathen: Thus: thus comprehensively; thus simply. Oh, how much is included in these few,
brief, simply expressed petitions! "Thus then do ye pray."
And my brethren, I venture to ask your special attention to this model in one respect. We
have two good classes of petitions here, as is obvious at once, petitions with reference
to God's glory, and petitions with reference to our own good. And my point is, that the
petitions with reference to God's glory come first. Now you have noticed, and indeed it
seems natural to us that when we pray, we pray first about ourselves, and a great deal
about ourselves, and then if we do not forget, if there seems to be time left before we
close the prayer, we may introduce some petitions as to God's glory. But here the class of
petitions which refer to God's glory come first. That is their rightful place. I do not
feel they should always come first in order, that there ought to be any formality or
stiffness in it, but that they should often be put in the place of priority, and regularly
in the place of pre-eminence. Much more important is it that God's name should be
hallowed, and God's kingdom come in the world, than that you and I, as individuals, should
gain the blessings we desire.
And now I propose to you, that while of course we cannot bring out many of the thoughts
involved in this comprehensive prayer, we shall try to get some practical lessons from it.
I. Observe first, the petitions which relate to God's glory.
1. "Hallowed be thy name." The words are so simple, we have known them so well
from our childhood, that it is really difficult to stop and ask what they mean. Let thy
name be made holy. God's name represents himself. It is a prayer that his name, and
himself as represented by his name, may be regarded as holy-spoken of as holy-treated as
holy. We have a model here in the picture given by Isaiah, the adoring Seraphs covering
their faces in awe before the throne. What do they cry? Not, as often we do; great,
majestic, glorious-not a word about his power, nor even about his wisdom-"Holy, Holy,
Holy, Lord God of Hosts." That is the central thought, that ought to be our deepest
desire, that God may be regarded, and spoken of, and treated, as holy.
Oh, what a contrast between that scene of the vision, and the sights and the souls of this
world in which we live. Walk the streets anywhere; listen to the talk wherever you find
it, especially when men grow excited. Hear them! Hear bow that high and holy name is
bandied as a jest and polluted with profanity. It is enough to make a man shiver to hear
the profanity that abounds everywhere. I have shivered, literally, sometimes as I
listened. But my brethren, have we nothing to do but to look with horror at other men's
profanity? There are some things important to our own life here. Have a care that while
you may not use in vain the sacred name of God itself, you shall not fall into the
practice of using other sacred expressions lightly and irreverently. I have heard even
refined ladies use phrases in a light way, that were appropriate only in solemn prayer;
and to a certain extent that was irreverence, that was profanity. Have a care about
indulging wit that comes from profaning the language of Scripture, and allusions to God.
Bluff old Dr. Johnson once said that "a man that has any respect for himself ought to
be above that kind of wit, it is so cheap: any one can do that." Yes, anyone that has
any respect for himself ought to be above that kind of wit, and a man that has any
reverence for God ought to shrink from it. Have a care how you repeat the profanity of
other men. You want to tell a good story and the point of it perhaps lies in a profane
expression. Now is it that you should repeat that expression? Is it good for yourself to
repeat it? Is it healthy? Especially is it good for that boy there that is hearing, and
may not make the nice distinction that you make, when you repeat other men's profanity? I
would not inculcate scrupulosity about trifles, but perchance this is not a trifle, and it
seems to me that we who pray this prayer, ought to lay such things to our hearts, and
shrink with horror, and cultivate ourselves into shrinking with shuddering, from anything
like profanity. Oh, that God's name might always be spoken with deepest reverence. Oh,
that God himself might come to be everywhere thought of, and talked about, and obeyed, as
holy. Anyhow, let us try to have it so in our hearts, on our lips, in our lives.
2. And the second petition, "Thy reign come." I am not going to explain all
these simple words of course, but here is one that wants explaining. The Greek word which
is rendered "kingdom" in the text requires three English words to convey its
meaning. Primarily the word means "kingship," the condition of being a king, the
possession of royal power. Then secondarily it means "reign," the exercise of
royal power. As a final derivation it means what we call "kingdom," subjects or
territory over whom or in which this royal power is exercised. Kingship, and reign, and
kingdom. There are many cases of that kind in translation, where several terms have to be
used in one language to convey the meaning of a single word in another. Now the leading
thought here is evidently that which we express by the word "reign." And the
reference is to the Messianic reign which the prophets had long foretold; that Messianic
reign of which David had sung; that Messianic reign which John the Baptist bad declared
was now near at hand, and Jesus at the beginning of his ministry in Galilee took up the
same cry, "The kingdom of heaven is near at hand; repent therefore and believe the
good tidings." Men had long prayed that that reign might come, and now there was all
the more propriety in such a prayer, for it was near at hand.
Do you think there is no need of that prayer still? Do you think the reign, the Messianic
reign of God in the world, has come? It has but begun. It was beginning when Jesus taught
these teachings. It began still more when he rose triumphant from the grave and ascended
glorious into the sky. It began still further, on the day of Pentecost. It began in
another sense at the destruction of Jerusalem, which he spoke of beforehand as the time
when he should come in his kingdom. It has begun on the earth, ah! it has not come yet.
Alas, for the wide portions of the world where the very name of the King Messiah has not
come. Alas, in the metropolis of one of the great Christian nations of today, the great
mass of the men that surge around us, are utterly unsanctified by the gospel, utterly
heedless of the reign of God. Stop any moment and think, between two heartbeats, of this
great world you live in, of this great city you live in, and then you shall address
yourself with new fervor to the prayer: "Thy reign come, O God! thy reign!"
Anyhow, let it come in us; let it pervade our whole being; let it control our whole life;
let it sanctify our home life; let it elevate our social life; let it purify our business
life; let men feel, as they note our conduct, that we are subjects of the Lord God.
3. I shall not dwell, for lack of time, upon the third petition here, which is but an
expansion of the preceding. For, as I have said, whenever God's reign has fully come, then
his will must be done on earth. Many things occur now that are not according to God's
will. The prayer is that God's will may take place; that everything may happen on earth in
accordance with God's will, as in heaven everything does happen. Many times for us, I know
it is hard even to consent that this shall be so. When it is plainly God's will
that something should happen, which to us is painful, we shrink and with difficulty we
say, "Thy will be done." No wonder: it has been so with better persons than we
are. Certain disciples, when they besought Paul not to go up to Jerusalem and he would not
be persuaded, ceased and said: "The will of the Lord be done." The struggling
Saviour in Gethsemane as he strove in agony and prayer to nerve himself up for what he had
to bear, said again and again-for it would not stay said: "nevertheless, not my will,
but thine he done." No wonder we find it hard sometimes to say that. The prayer
teaches us not merely to submit to God's will, but to desire that God's will may take
place in the world; that everything concerning us and concerning all around us may happen
according to his will. And if he takes away our property, our health, our usefulness, our
life, or some one we love better than our life, still we would say and we should rejoice
when we say, "Thy will be done." Oh, if it could be so; if in the world, whether
gaining or losing, in success or failure, it could be so, in us and about us, that God's
will were done in all things-what a joy in the thought; what a springing gladness it puts
into the heart, the very idea!
II. But perhaps we shall find, not more important but more practical lessons if we turn to
the second part of the prayer, which contains petitions relating to ourselves.
1. First: "Give us this day our daily bread." Now I entreat you, don't listen to
the commentaries, so many of which tell you that this means spiritual bread. I am weary of
that everlasting spiritualizing. Spiritual things are far above temporal things, but there
are many references in the Scriptures to our temporal and material wants, and why should
we lose their meaning, and sustaining power, because we go on allegorizing everything. It
is plainly a prayer for temporal good, as represented by that which is most essential, and
thus stated in the simplest possible form; and a prayer with reference simply to day after
day. A little child sees its meaning and feels its sweetness, and the wisest man can find
no higher wisdom than to cry still: "Give us this day our daily bread."
My brethren, I should be inclined to think that above all the petitions of the prayer this
needs to be enforced in our time. I have known some Christians who were very unwilling to
realize that there was any human exertion in obtaining spiritual good. They say, if that
be true, how is it the gift of God? And if it be the gift of God, how can it be the effort
of our own labor? Yet if spiritual good is the gift of God, so is temporal good the gift
of God, though it is obtained only by human effort. The truth is, we see, that both are
the gift of God, and both are the result of our own exertions.
Especially with reference to one of the great tendencies of thought in our time is it
important that we should cherish this petition for our daily bread. "Pshaw!" men
say, "that depends upon physical forces and laws; upon material things; upon your own
exertion, man; upon the climate and the weather." Now in the face of these notions it
becomes all the more appropriate that we should pray to God to give us daily bread. Yes,
and I tell you plainly and boldly, though I have not time to develop the thought, if it is
not right and wise to ask God for daily bread, if as they tell you in the newspapers so
often, there is no efficacy in prayer, there is no use in praying for rain, then there is
no God at all. You are driven straight to it by absolute logical necessity. li it is not
proper to pray for daily bread and to pray for rain, there is no God; there is nothing in
existence but matter, with its organization and its results. You cannot help it; there is
no standing room, for the life of you, between those two positions. Alas, alas, how many
in our time, one-sided or superficial, have gone into utter materialism. Never was there a
time when it was more needful that the Christian world should realize in their experience
the sentiment of this prayer. We work for daily bread, and we plan for years to come, but
none the less are we to seek it as the daily gift of the daily goodness of our Father in
heaven.
2. "And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors." The simple prayer for
temporal things all embraced in that one petition for what is most indispensable, and now
in addition, a twofold prayer-forgiveness for past sin, and deliverance from sin in the
future. That our God may be glorified; that our earthly wants may be supplied, and that we
may be forgiven our sin, and delivered from evil-that is all there is to pray for.
You know that the term "debt" is used here as an Aramaic expression to denote
sin-sin regarded as a debt, which we must pay to God, or in the kindred phrase of other
languages, "pay the penalty." You notice that when our Lord repeats the thought
a moment later he say trespasses, or transgressions. You remember that when he gives the
prayer on a subsequent occasion it is: "Forgive us our sins; for we also forgive
everyone that is indebted to us." "Forgive us our debts" means, forgive us
our sins. My friends, does it ever occur to you that you are more anxious about the
"give" than the "forgive"? Does it ever happen in your experience that
you pray that God would give and forget to ask that God would forgive? And yet, is not
this last as deep a need? Yea, a deeper need than the other? Ah! that a man should have
all earthly things given him, and his sins not forgiven, would be a poor gift. Yet a man
who should be deprived of all earthly things and go starving into the other world, yet
with his sins forgiven, would be rich and might rejoice. Let us not forget as we go on
praying for what God has to give, to ask still more earnestly that he would forgive us our
sins.
I must beg you in connection with the prayer to dwell upon the condition which our Lord
here presents. It is a matter of the utmost practical importance to all of us.
"Forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors." You have noticed surely, that
after completing this simple prayer, Jesus before going on to speak of other things, takes
up again one of the thoughts of the prayer; and which one is it? Something about God's
name being hallowed, or his reign coming? Something about daily bread? Something about
temptation, or evil? Nay: it is this one; this one thought he repeats, repeats it
positively and negatively. For if you forgive men their trespasses, your Heavenly Father
will also forgive you, and if you forgive not, neither will your Heavenly Father forgive
you. You know why-you know yourself but little if you do not well know why he dwells upon
this. The disposition to be revengeful, or at any rate to be unforgiving, is one of the
deepest rooted, one of the hardest to correct, one of the most hurtful and ruinous in its
influence, of all the evil dispositions that belong to our sinful human nature. So our
Lord presents forgiving as the condition of being forgiven, the condition sine qua
non-if we do not forgive men we cannot be forgiven. He does not mean that our
forgiving in the meritorious ground of our being forgiven. It is an indispensable
condition. Only if we do forgive men can we be forgiven, but then we are forgiven on the
ground which the gospel provides-the merit which is not our own.
Now let us make a practical distinction. We use that word "forgive" in a
somewhat ambiguous fashion. In the strict and proper sense it is not our duty to forgive a
man unless he repents. God forgives in that sense no man but the penitent, and Jesus said,
you remember: "If thy brother sin against thee seven times in the day and seven times
in the day turn saying, 'I repent,' thou shalt forgive him." It is not right that you
should restore a man to the confidence he has forfeited, unless he shows himself worthy of
it. It is not right that you should forgive a man, in the full sense of the term, unless
he repents; not only is it not your duty, but it is not right. "Love your enemies,
that ye may be sons of your Father in heaven." God forgives only the penitent, and
loves them as his friends, but even the impenitent God loves. "He makes his sun to
rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the just and the unjust." He wishes
his enemies no harm, but does them good. We need not, and really should not, forgive a man
in the full sense while he remains impenitent, but we must in the other sense forgive him.
We must bear him no malice. We must do him no harm. We must be glad to do him good, in
anything that will not promote his evil designs against us. Thus shall we be the sons of
our Father in heaven.
I think this distinction is practically important. The idea of forgiving a man who is
impenitent does seem to be impracticable, and that is not what the Scriptures teach; but
that we should bear no malice and yield to no revenge, that is what the Scriptures teach.
Ah me, even this is hard enough for poor human nature! Let us strive to do that; let us
lay it to heart. Who is there here today among us who has not sometimes thought himself to
have been cruelly wronged? Who? We all have need then to exercise this forgiveness.
3. And finally, "bring us not into temptation." For it is not simply lead it
is bring. Human agency is, for the moment, here left out of account. The thought
is, of God's providence as bearing us on, and bringing us into certain situations, and the
prayer is that God will not bring us into circumstances of temptation of trial. Why?
Because we are afraid we cannot stand temptation. Ah, every man that knows himself will
most certainly feel an echo in his heart, "I am weak, O Lord bring me not into
temptation."
A man advertised for a coachman, and when the applicants came, he asked each one,
"How near would you undertake to run my carriage wheel to the edge of a
precipice?" The first one said he would run within a foot of it. The second said he
would run within six inches. The third was an Irishman, who said, "I would kape away
as far as I could,"-and he got the place. Maybe you will remember that, if you forget
my solemn injunction. O my Christian friends, pray that you may be kept away from
temptation, for you are weak, and let him that thinketh he standeth, take heed lest he
fall.
"Bring us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil." My brethren, this
simple prayer ought as a model to control all our praying. Its spirit ought to strike into
our blood, shaping our whole character, regulating our whole life. And as we pray it, oh,
ought not our life's endeavor to accord with it? What folly to pray, "Thy reign
come," and never a finger lifted to urge forward the progress of that reign; never a
sacrifice made, never deed done, nor word spoken, nought but idle prayer. What folly to
pray for forgiveness of sin, and pray for deliverance from evil, if along with the prayer
there be not the cherished desire after holiness, and the perpetual effort to abhor-to
abhor-that which is evil, and cleave to that which is good.
The Reformed Reader Home Page
Copyright 1999, The Reformed Reader, All Rights Reserved |