|
Man's Will-Free Yet Bound
by Walter J. Chantry
For more than fifteen hundred years the
Church has engaged in a heated debate over the freedom of man's will. The major
issues came to general attention in the early fifth century when Augustine and
Pelagius did battle on the subject. Through medieval times the nature of man's
freedom received a great deal of attention. As they studied the Scriptures,
Bernard and Anselm made significant contributions to the doctrine of the human
will. In the sixteenth century the freedom or bondage of the will was one of the
chief issues dividing Reformers and Roman Catholics. To the mind of Martin
Luther, it was the key to his dispute with Rome. In the seventeenth
century the nature of man's freedom was at the heart of the debate between
Arminians and Calvinists. The conflict surfaced again in the eighteenth century
during the Great Awakening. Finney's approach to revival in the nineteenth
century led the church astray through a misunderstanding of the human will. So
too the nature of man's will continues to bring intense disagreement between
Reformed and Fundamentalist believers.
A proper understanding of the content of the gospel and the use of GOD-honouring
methods in evangelism are dependent on one's grasp of this issue.
Some theologians, both Arminian and Calvinistic, have been quite lucid in their
discussions concerning man's will. Others, for example, Jonathan Edwards, have
soared into the lofty clouds of philosophy where many a believer faints in the
thin air of difficult logic and complex thought. But none is so refreshingly
clear as our holy LORD. His instruction on the subject is laced with vivid
illustrations to assist our groping minds:
Matthew 12.33-37 says, 'Either make the tree good, and his fruit good; or
else make the tree corrupt, and his fruit corrupt: for the tree is known by his
fruit. O generation of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things? For
out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh. A good man out of the good
treasure of the heart bringeth forth good things; and an evil man out of the
evil treasure bringeth forth evil things. But I say unto you, that every idle
word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of
judgment. For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt
be condemned.'
In this passage are three verbal windows through which the light of
Christ's lesson passes. Each presents a familiar scene. (1) A tree that has
fruit - v. 33. (2) A man who brings treasures out of a chest - v. 35. (3) A
stream that overflows from a fountain. This last is rather more obscure than the
first two, but it is suggested by our LORD's choice of words in v. 34. The word
'abundance' suggests superfluity or overflow.
I. Man has a will and that will has a certain freedom. Our
LORD clearly teaches that man has a power of choice. It is important to begin
here to disarm opponents of all the foolish accusations that have been brought
against the Biblical doctrine of man's will. Every man has the ability to choose
his own words, to decide what his actions will be. We have a faculty of
self-determination in the sense that we select our own thoughts, words, and
deeds. Man is free to choose what he prefers, what he desires.
No one ties fruit on a tree's branches, not even GOD. The tree bears its
own fruit. Evil men sin voluntarily; they take evil treasures out of their
chests, that is, evil words and deeds. Righteous men are holy by choice; they
select good treasures, that is, good words and works. The person who is speaking
and acting is completely responsible for his moral behaviour. This power of the
will is a vital part of human personality. It always exists in you and me and in
all to whom we witness or preach.
GOD never forces men to act against their wills. By workings of outward
providence or of inward grace, the LORD may change men's minds, but He will not
coerce a human being into thoughts, words or actions. When GOD in His holy wrath
sent the Israelites to drive the Canaanites from their land, He also sent
hornets against them. There is a children's song which tells the story of these
hornets stinging the Canaanites, causing the pagans to flee the land. The chorus
then sings:
GOD never compels us to go, Oh no,
He never compels us to go;
GOD does not compel us to go 'gainst our will,
but He just makes us willing to go.
When Saul was converted, the LORD did not
compel him to edify the church instead of persecuting it. He added a new factor
of inward grace in his soul, consequently Paul changed his decision. GOD may
renew the will but He never coerces it.
The Westminster Confession is very careful to assert the liberty of the
human will. When it speaks of GOD's eternal decrees, we are told, 'GOD from all
eternity did . . . freely and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass: yet
so, as thereby neither is GOD the author of sin, nor is violence offered to the
will of the creatures, nor is the liberty or contingency of second causes taken
away, but rather established.' When discussing Free Will, the Confession begins,
'GOD hath endued the will of man with that natural liberty, that it is neither
forced, nor by any absolute necessity of nature determined, to good or evil.'
Neither by creation nor by subsequent acts of GOD are man's decisions made for
him; he is free to choose for himself.
This sort of freedom of the will is essential to responsibility! Having a
will is a necessary ingredient to being morally accountable. This is clearly
implied in our LORD's words in verses 36 and 37: 'I say unto you, that every
idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of
judgment. For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt
be condemned.' A man can be condemned only because the words are his own. He was
free to bring them out of his treasure chest. They were the overflow of the
fountain of his own heart. They are the fruits of his own tree of nature. No one
imposed the words on his lips. He chose them. Society, companions, parents
cannot be blamed. Idle words are the product of the man's own will.
It is vital for every minister to appreciate the importance of man's will.
For in evangelism the will must be addressed. In preaching the gospel we are not
only to shine the light of truth upon darkened minds. We are also to appeal to
men's perverted wills to choose Christ. Faith is as much an act of the will as
it is of the mind. When by the Spirit a mind understands essential truths, by
the same Spirit the will must trust Christ. Repentance is a selecting of good
and a refusing of evil. Volition is central to faith and repentance.
Indeed, in conversion, a man must make a decision. We shy away from that
term because in modern jargon a 'decision' has come to be identified with an
outward expression, such as raising the hand or going forward to the front.
While such external acts have nothing to do with forgiveness of sins, the heart
must make a decision to be saved.
When Christ stood to cry 'If any man thirst, let him come unto me and
drink,' He was soliciting a willing choice of Himself as satisfying drink for
the soul. GOD urges all sinners to come just because they may come. And
it is our duty to inform the sinner that he has a warrant, a right to choose
Christ. Beyond this, we must assure him that he has a positive duty to
embrace the Saviour.
The great guilt of sinners under the gospel is that they will not come.
Christ complained in John
5.40: 'Ye will not come to me that ye
might have life.' And to Jerusalem He sobbed, 'O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, how often
would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her
chickens under her wings and ye would not !' There is in the unregenerate
hearer of the gospel an obstinate, wilful choice not to come. Hence it is that
in flaming fire Christ will come to take vengeance on them that obey
not the gospel [2 Thess 1.8]. In the free exercise of their uncoerced wills
men have rejected the Son of GOD.
In speaking of responsibility we have implied nothing regarding ability, as
will be seen below. But the point is that men have wills which must be addressed
as powerfully and directly as their minds and emotions in gospel preaching. Men
must be confronted with their responsibility. 'This is the work of GOD, that ye
believe into Him whom He hath sent' [John 6.29].
II. Man's Will is not a Sovereign Faculty. Although man does
have a will, it is neither independent of all influences nor supreme over all
other parts of his personality. This is the next point to be seen in our LORD's
teaching.
Pelagians, Roman Catholics, Arminians and Finneyites have all held one
common view of the nature of man. They suggest that the will of man is in some
way neutral, that it exists in a state of moral suspension. It is their
understanding that with equal ease the will can choose good or evil; it can
receive or reject Christ. With only degrees of difference and variety of
explanation, this is their common opinion. Pelagians have taught that the will
is neutral because man's heart is morally neutral. Arminians, on the other hand,
acknowledge the human heart to be evil. But they suggest that prevenient grace
has hung the will upon a 'sky hook' of neutrality from which it can swing either
to receive or to reject the gospel. The common ground, however, is this idea of
neutrality. The will, they tell us, is disinterested. Ultimately this controls
their entire view of conversion and of sanctification.
It will be noted that our Master taught that the human will is not free
from the other faculties of the heart. Far from the will reigning over a man,
the will is determined by the man's own character. It is not raised to a
position of dominance over the entire man.
Man is like a tree. His heart, not his will alone, is the root. There is no
possible way by which the will can choose to produce fruit contrary to the
character of the root. If the root is bad, the tree is bound by its very nature
to produce evil fruit. Man is like a person standing alongside his treasure
chest. There is no possibility of bringing pure gold out of a box filled only
with rusty steel. The contents of the heart determine what words and deeds may
be brought out. Far from being neutral, the will must reach into the heart for
its choices. Every thought, word and deed will partake of the nature of the
treasure within. Man is like a stream which cannot rise above its source. If
the fountain is polluted, the outflow will be evil. If the source be sweet, the
stream will not be bitter and cannot choose to be so.
These three illustrations alike contain the same lesson. What a man is
determines what he chooses. Choices of the will always reveal the character of
the heart, because the heart determines the choices. Men are not sinners because
they choose to sin; they choose to sin because they are sinners. If this were
not so, we could never know a tree by its fruits, nor could we judge a man's
character by his acts.
In modern times we observe rockets fired so that they escape from the
earth's gravity. To accomplish this there is a great complex of electrical wires
all woven into one control centre, called in the U.S. 'Mission Control.'
According to the Bible, the heart is the Mission Control of a man's life. The
heart is the motivational complex of a man, the basic disposition, the entire
bent of character, the moral inclination. The mind, emotions, desires, and will
are all wires which we observe; none is independent but all are welded into a
common circuit. If mission control is wired for evil, the will cannot make the
rockets of life travel on the path of righteousness. The will cannot escape the
direction of thoughts, feelings, longings and habits to produce behaviour of an
opposite moral quality. 'Will' may be the button which launches the spacecraft.
But the launching button does not determine the direction. Direction is
dependent upon the complex wiring system.
If the will were able to make decisions contrary to reason, and to the
likes and desires of the heart, it would be a monster. You would find yourself
in a restaurant ordering all the foods you detest. You would find yourself
selecting the company you loathe. But the will is not a monster. It cannot
choose without consulting your intelligence, reflecting your feelings, and
taking account of your desires. You are free to be yourself. The will cannot
transform you into someone else.
This is most profoundly true in the moral and religious realms. When the
mind is at war with GOD, denying His truth; when the emotions hate Christ His
Son; when the desires wish GOD's law and gospel were exterminated from the
earth; the will cannot be in a position to choose Christ. If it were, a man
would not be truly free to be himself. Here is the tragic truth about man's
will. While free from outward coercion, it is in a state of bondage. It is not
in a stated neutrality. It is not a lever with which to move a man's personality
from sin to righteousness, from unbelief to faith. This brings us to the third
element in Christ's words.
III. Man's Will is in Bondage to Sin. The chains which bind a
man's will to sin do not result from the actions of the Omnipotent GOD. The
binding chains are the man's own depraved faculties. The prison is his own
nature.
Our LORD's rhetorical question in verse 34 brings this home with force: 'O
generation of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things ?' Our wise LORD
is suggesting that a man must speak as he does because of what he is. To sinners
He was saying 'You are unable to choose good words because you possess an evil
heart. If the tree is bad, if the treasure chest is filled with evil things
alone, if the fountain is bitter, your will cannot produce good words [fruits,
treasures, overflow].'
At this point there are very many scriptures which attest to a man's
bondage to sin by his own nature. To mention but a few - Jeremiah 13.23: 'Can
the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? Then may ye also do
good, that are accustomed to do evil;' John 6.44: 'No man can come to me, except
the Father which hath sent me draw him;' Romans 8.7: 'The carnal mind . . . is
not subject to the law of GOD, neither indeed can be.'
Pelagian, Arminian and modern Fundamentalist support for the moral and
spiritual freedom of the will usually centres on one point. We have admitted
that man has a responsible freedom. He is free to be himself. He is held
accountable for his words and deeds, especially for his receiving or rejecting
Christ. On all of this we agree. They use this toehold to argue that the will is
not in bondage to sin but has the power of contrary choice. It can do either
good or evil, at least when confronted with the gospel. They insist that the
responsibility of the will to choose Christ implies ability of the will to
choose Christ.
There is no scriptural defence of this belief, none that I have ever seen
in print. The argument is completely philosophical. It runs as follows: If a man
cannot do good, it would be unjust to punish him as evil. Furthermore, if a
sinner cannot repent, it would be foolish to command all men everywhere to
repent. GOD is not foolish and He has commanded repentance. Therefore men are
able to repent.
We can only reply that those who applaud the powers of the will with such
arguments have not read the Bible very carefully. To maintain their
philosophical premises they will have to argue with Christ their LORD. For our
Prophet tells us in verses 36 and 37 of our text that in the day of judgment men
will be held responsible for their evil words. Yet in verse 34 our Teacher tells
the very same men that they cannot speak good words because they are bound by
their evil character.
Lazarus in his tomb had no ability to respond when our LORD commanded,
'Come forth.' The man who had been impotent for 38 years had no native ability
to obey when Jesus commanded him to take up his bed and walk. Nor have modern
sinners ability to believe when we preach. 'This is his commandment, that we
believe on the name of his Son Jesus Christ' [I John 3.23].
When a sinner refuses to come to Christ, he is guilty because he has made a
free choice. It reflects his own state of mind, feeling and attitude toward GOD
and His Son. He has acted voluntarily without coercion. It is his decision. But
the poor sinner, dead in trespasses and sins, could not do otherwise, being
evil. It is not necessary for him to have a neutral will, or the ability to do
both good and evil, for his action to be held accountable before the Judge of
all hearts.
Anselm is very helpful on this matter. This medieval theologian points out
that if ability to sin is necessary to true liberty or responsibility, then GOD
is neither free nor praiseworthy. For the scriptures teach us that GOD cannot
lie. Similarly, saints in glory will be neither free nor responsible; for in
eternity the LORD's people have confirmed righteousness. Anselm goes on to show
the Biblical emphasis of freedom. True liberty rests in the ability to do good
whereas he that does sin is the slave of sin. If true liberty rests in
the ability to do good in GOD's sight, then the highest liberty rests in the
inability to do otherwise. This highest freedom belongs to the sons of GOD in
glory. How Biblical were Anselm's insights!
No doubt Anselm's thinking has influenced the Westminster Confession's
wording in the chapter 'Of Free Will.' For it says that Adam 'had freedom and
power to will and to do that which is good and wellpleasing to GOD.' Yet this
freedom was mutable, subject to change. Man could and did lose his liberty in
the sense of being able to do good. This is not the same as a man's liberty to
be himself. 'Man, by his fall into a state of sin, hath wholly lost all ability
of will to any spiritual good accompanying salvation; so as a natural man, being
altogether averse from that good, and dead in sin, is not able, by his own
strength, to convert himself, or prepare himself thereto.'
Bernard was very near the truth when he wrote of our condition in Adam:
'The soul, in some strange and evil way, is held under this kind of voluntary,
yet sadly free necessity, both bond and free; bond in respect of necessity, free
in respect of will: and what is still more strange, and still more miserable, it
is guilty because free, and enslaved because guilty, and therefore enslaved
because free.'
We have seen that man is free to be himself and therefore is enslaved to
sin by a wicked heart. And this brings us to the most profound truth regarding
the salvation of souls. It is crucial to our preaching. It is vital to saving
impressions in our hearers.
IV. Man's Will is not his Hope. Our LORD has taught that the
tree must be made good. Man must be renewed in his entire character. He must
have a new heart to bring forth good fruit; the will cannot make the tree good;
it may only exercise liberty to be what the tree already is. The will cannot
reload the treasure chest with a new kind of goods; it may only freely bring
forth what is there. The will cannot cleanse the fountainhead; it may overflow
only with the waters available in the soul.
Any gospel preaching that relies upon an act of the human will for the
conversion of sinners has missed the mark. Any sinner who supposes that his will
has the strength to do any good accompanying salvation is greatly deluded and
far from the kingdom. We are cast back upon the regenerating work of the Spirit
of the living GOD to make the tree good. Unless GOD does something in the
sinner, unless GOD creates a clean heart and renews a right spirit within man,
there is no hope of a saving change.
While we address the wills of men in gospel preaching, they are wills bound in the grave clothes of an evil heart. But as we speak, and the LORD owns His word, sinners are quickened to life by divine power. His people are made willing in the day of His power [Psa 110.3]. All who are adopted as sons of GOD were 'born not of the will of man, but of GOD.' [John 1. 13] We stand to preach with no power to make the tree good. The 'trees' before us cannot make themselves good, so no gimmicks or policies of men can persuade them to make the change. But our glorious GOD, by inward, secret, transforming power, can make the tree good, the treasures good, the fountain good. Thus all glory be to GOD and to the Lamb! Salvation is of the LORD!
? This article reproduced by permission from THE BANNER OF TRUTH magazine, Issue 140, May 1975.?
The Reformed Reader Home Page
Copyright 1999, The Reformed Reader, All Rights Reserved |