|
The Form and Spirit of Religion
A Sermon Delivered on Sabbath Morning, April 4, 1858, by the
REV. C.H. SPURGEON
At the Music Hall, Royal Surrey Gardens
"Let us fetch the ark of the covenant of the Lord out of Shiloh unto us, that, when it cometh among us, it may save us out of the hand of our enemies."1 Samuel 4:3.
These men made a great mistake: what they wanted was
the Lord in their midst; whereas they imagined that the symbol of God's presence, the ark
of the covenant, would be amply sufficient to bestow upon them the assistance which they
required in the day of battle. As is man, such must his religion be. Now, man is a
compound being. To speak correctly, man is a spiritual being: he hath within him a soul, a
substance far beyond the bounds of matter. But man is also made up of a body as well as a
soul. He is not pure spirit; his spirit is incarnate in flesh and blood. Now, such is our
religion. The religion of God is, as to its vitality, purely spiritualalways so; but
since man is made of flesh as well as of spirit, it seemed necessary that his religion
should have something of the outward, external, and material, in which to embody the
spiritual, or else man would not have been able to lay hold upon it. This was especially
the case under the old dispensation. The religion of the Jew is really a heavenly and
spiritual thing; a thing of thought, a thing that concerns the mind and spirit; but the
Jew was untaught; he was but a babe, unable to understand spiritual things unless he saw
them pictured out to him, or, (to repeat what I have just said) unless he saw them
embodied in some outward type and symbol: and therefore God was pleased to give the Jew a
great number of ceremonies, which were to his religion what the body is to man's soul. The
Jewish religion taught the doctrine of the atonement, but the Jew could not understand it,
and therefore God gave him a lamb to be slain every morning and every evening, and he gave
him a goat over which the sins of the people were to be confessed, and which was to be
driven into the depths of the wilderness, to show the great doctrine of a substitute and
atonement through him. The Jewish religion teaches, as one of its prominent doctrines, the
unity of the Godhead; but the Jew was ever apt to forget that there was but one God; and
God, to teach him that, would have but one temple, and but one altar upon which the
sacrifice might rightly be offered. So that the idea of the one God was (as I have already
said) made incarnate in the fact that there was but one temple, but one altar, and but one
great high priest. And mark, this is true of our religionChristianity: not true to
so full an extent as of Judaismfor the religion of the Jew had a gross and heavy
bodybut our religion has a body transparent, and having but little of materialism in
it. If you ask me what I would call the materialism of our religion, the embodiment of the
spiritual part of that in which we trust and hope, I would point, first of all, to the two
ordinances of the Lord, Baptism and the Lord's Supper. I would point you next to the
services of God's house, to the Sabbath day, to the outward ritual of our worship: I would
point you to our solemn song, to our sacred service of prayer; and I would point you
alsoand I think I am right in so doingto the form of sound words, which we
ever desire to hold fast and firm, as containing that creed which it is necessary for men
to believe if they would hold the truth as it is in Jesus. Our religion, then, has an
outward form even to this day; for the Apostle Paul, when he spoke of professing
Christians, spoke of some who had "a form of godliness, but denied the power
thereof." So that it is still true, though I confess not to the same extent as it was
in the days of Moses, that religion must have a body, that the spiritual thing may come
out palpably before our vision, and that we may see it.
Now, three points this morning inferred from our narrative. The first point is thisthat
the outward form of religion is to be carefully and reverently observed. But my second
and most important head is thisyou will notice that the very men who have the
least of the spirit of religion are the most superstitiously observant of the form of it;
just as you find the people here, who did not care for God, had a very superstitious
regard for that chest called the ark of the covenant. And then, my third point will be,
that those who trust in the outward form of religion, apart from the spirit of it, are
fearfully deceived, and the result of their deception must be of the most fatal character.
The first point I feel is necessary, lest I should lead any to despise the form of
religion, while endeavoring to insist upon the absolute necessity of attending in the
first place to the spirit of it.
I. In the first place then, THE FORM OF RELIGION IS TO BE REVERENTLY OBSERVED. This ark of
the covenant was with the Jew the most sacred instrument of his religion. There were many
other things which he held holy: but this ark always stood in the most holy place, and it
was rendered doubly sacred, because, between the outstretched wings of those cherubic
figures that rested upon the mercy-seat, there was usually to be seen a bright light,
called the Shekinah, which manifested that Jehovah, the God of Israel, who dwelt between
the cherubims, was there. And, indeed, they had great reason in the days of Samuel to
reverence this ark, for you will recollect that when Moses went to war with the
Midianites, a great slaughter of that people was occasioned by the fact that Eleazar, the
high priest, with a silver trumpet, stood in the forefront of the battle, bearing in his
hands the holy instruments of the lawthat is , the ark; and it was by the presence
of this ark that the victory was achieved. It was by this ark, too, that the river Jordan
was dried up. When the tribes came to it, there was no ford, but the priests put the
staves of the ark upon their shoulders, and they marched with solemn pace down to the
waters' edge, and before the presence of the ark the waters receded, so that the people
went through dry-shod. And when then had landed in the promised country, you remember it
was by this ark that the walls of Jericho fell flat to the ground; for the priests,
blowing the trumpets and carrying the ark, went before, when they compassed the city seven
days, and at last, by the power of the ark, or rather by the power of that God who dwelt
within the ark, the walls of Jericho fell flat down, and every man went straight up to the
slaughter. These people, therefore, thought if they could once get the ark, it would be
all right, and they would be sure to triumph; and, while I shall have in the second head,
to insist upon it that they were wrong in superstitiously imputing strength to the poor
chest, yet the ark was to be reverently observed, for it was the outward symbol of a high
spiritual truth, and it was never to be treated with any indignity.
It is quite certain, in the first place, that the form of religion must never be
altered. You remember that this ark was made by Moses, according to the pattern that
God had given him in the mount. Now, the outward forms of our religion, if they be
correct, are made by God. His two great ordinances of Baptism and the Lord's Supper are
sent for us from on high. I dare not alter either of them. I should think it is a high sin
and treason against heaven, if, believing that baptism signifieth immersion, and immersion
only, I should pretend to administer it by sprinkling; or, believing that baptism
appertaineth to believers only, I should consider myself a criminal in the sight of God if
I should give it to any but those who believe. Even so with the Lord's Supper. Believing
that it consists of bread and wine, I hold it to be highly blasphemous in the Church of
Rome to withhold the cup from the people; and knowing that this ordinance was intended for
the Lord's people only, I consider it an act of high treason against the Majesty of
Heaven, when any are admitted to the Lord's Supper who have not made a profession of their
faith and of their repentance, and who do not declare themselves to be the true children
of God. And with regard to the doctrines of the Gospel, no alteration must be allowed
here. I know that forms of doctrine are very little, compared with the spirit and the
heart; but still we must not alter even the form of it. It has often been said, that we
ought not to have a strict religion. I believe that is just the very thing we ought to
have: a religion that is of such a cast that it does not know how to alter; a religion
that comes from the Infallible Head of the Church, that is, Jesus Christ our Lord, and
which to the latest time is to be like the Law and the Prophetsnot on jot or tittle
of it must fail while the earth endureth. The men who think that we may alter this and
alter that, and still maintain the spirit of religion, have some truth on their side; but
let them remember, that while the spirit of religion may be maintained in the midst of
many errors, yet every error tends to weaken our spirituality. And, beside that, have no
right to consider the effect upon ourselves merely. Whatever form of religion God has
ordained, it is ours to practise without the slightest alteration; and to alter any one of
the ordinances of God is an act of dire profanation; however reasonable that alteration
may seem to be, it is treason against high heaven, and is not to be permitted in the
Church of Christ. "Hold fast the form of sound words," said Paul, "which
thou hast heard of me;" or, as I remember to have said before, while the form of
religion is not power, yet unless the form be carefully observed, it is not easy to
maintain the power. It is like an egg-shell enclosing the egg; there is no life in the shell,
but you must take care you do not crack it, or else you may destroy the life within. The
ordinances and doctrines of our faith are only the shell of religionthey are not the
life; but we must take care that we do not hurt so much as the outward shell, for if we
do, we may endanger the life within; though that may manage to live, it must be weakened
by any injury done to the outward form thereof.
And as the form must not be altered, so it must not be despised. These Philistines
despised the ark. They took it and set it in their idol temple, and the result was that
their idol god, Dagon, was broken in pieces. They then sent it through their cities, and
they were smitten with emerods. And then, being afraid to put it within walls, they set it
in the open country, and they were invaded with mice, so that everything was eaten up. God
would not have any dishonour put even upon the outward form of his religion; he would have
men reverently take care that they did no dishonour even to his ark; it might be nothing
but gopher-wood, but because, between the wings of those cherubim God had dwelt, the ark
was to be held sacred, and God would not have it dishonoured. Take care, ye that despise
God, lest ye despise his outward ordinances. To laugh at the Sabbath, to despise the
ordinances of God's House, to neglect the means of grace, to call the outward form of
religion a vain thingall this is highly offensive in the sight of God. He will have
us remember that while the form is not the life, yet the form is to be respected for the
sake of the life which it contains; the body is to be venerated for the sake of the inward
soul; and as I would have no man maim my body, even though in maiming it he might not be
able to wound my soul, so God would have no man maim the outward parts of religion,
although it is true no man can touch the real vitality of it.
Yet one more remark, and that a very solemn one. As the outward form is neither to be
altered nor despised, so neither is it to be intruded upon by unworthy persons. You
remember that this ark of the covenant, after it was brought back from the land of the
Philistines, was set in the field of Joshua the Bethshemite, and the Bethshemites took off
the lid, and looked into the ark of the Lord, and, for this, the Lord "smote of that
people fifty-thousand and three-score and ten men; and the people lamented because the
Lord had smitten many of the people with a great slaughter." These Bethshemites had
no intention whatever of dishonouring the ark. They had a vain curiosity to look within,
and the sight of those marvellous tables of stone struck them with death; for the law,
when it is not covered by the mercy-seat, is death to any man, and it was death to them.
Now, you will easily remember how very solemn a penalty is attached to any man's intruding
into the outward form of religion when he is not called to do so. Let me quote this awful
passage: "He" (speaking of the Lord's Supper) "that eateth and drinketh
unworthily eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body."
How frightful an announcement is that! A curse is pronounced upon the man who dares to
touch even the outward form of religion, unless he hath the power of it; and we know there
is nothing which excites God's holy anger more swiftly than a man's attending to the
ordinances of his house and making an outward profession of being in Christ, while he has
no part nor lot in the matter. Oh, take heed. The outward ordinances of Christ are not the
vitality of religion, but nevertheless they are so solemnly important, that we must
neither alter nor despise them, nor rush into them without being invited; for if we do so,
the curse of God must light upon us for having despised the holy thing of the Most High
God of Israel.
And now, before I close this first head, let me remark, that the outward things of God
are to be diligently cared for and loved. We have in our reading had two instances of
that. There was holy Eli: he knew very well that the ark of God was not God; he understood
that it was but the outward sign of the inward and spiritual; yet when the ark of God was
taken, mark the poor old man's trouble: his heart broke, and then he fell down and broke
his neck. Then there was that nameless woman. Her husband was the priest who attended to
this very ark, but he was a man whose character I cannot describe better than by saying
that he was a son of Belial. It is hard for a woman to believe religion if she has a
minister for a husband who is profane and wicked. This woman's husband not only committed
wrongs against God, but against her. He was a filthy and unclean person, who polluted the
very courts of the Lord's house with his fornications; and yet she had such faith in her
God, that she knew how to love the religion which her husband, by his awful character,
brought into disrepute. She knew how to distinguish between the man and his duty, between
the priest and the priesthood, between the officer and the office. I do wonder at her. I
am sure there is nothing that staggers our faith like seeing a minister walking
inconsistently; but this man was the chief minister, and her own husband, living in known
sin, and a sin which came home to her, because he sinned against her. I am sure it was
wonderful that she believed at all; but so strong was her faith and attachment to her
religion, that though, like Eli, she knew that the ark was not God, that the form was not
the inward thing, yet the form itself was so precious to her, that the pangs of
child-birth were hurried on prematurely and in the midst of her pain, this still was
uppermostthat the ark of the Lord was taken. It was in vain to cheer her with the
news that her child was born; it was an idle tale to her, and she rejoiced not in it. She
lay in a swoon; but at last, opening her eyes, and remembering that her husband was dead,
and that therefore, according to Jewish usage, it was her duty to give the child a name,
she faintly opened her lips before she died, and said, "Call his name Inglorious
(Ichabod) for the glory is departed;" and then she added this reason for it: she did
not say, "because my husband is dead," though she loved him; she did not say,
"because my father-in-law, Eli, is dead" or "because my nation has been
defeated," but she added that all-significant reason, "because the ark of the
Lord was taken;" and she died. Oh, I would to God that we all loved God's house, and
loved the ways of God, and the ordinances of God as much as she did. While we attach no
superstitious importance to the outward ceremony, I wish we thought as much of holy
things, because of the Holy One of Israel. as did Eli, and this nameless, but noble woman.
Thus I have preached upon the first head, and no ceremonialist here, I am sure, can differ
from me, for they must all say it is true. Even the Puseyite will confess that this is
just what he believesthat ceremonies ought to be carefully observed. But I shall not
agree with Mr. Puseyite in the second head.
II. Now, it is a notorious fact, that THE VERY MEN WHO HAVE THE LEAST IDEA OF WHAT
SPIRITUAL RELIGION IS, ARE THE MEN WHO PAY THE MOST SUPERSTITIOUS ATTENTION TO OUTWARD
FORMS. We refer you again to this instance. These people would neither repent, nor pray,
nor seek God and his prophets; yet they sought out this ark and trusted in it with
superstitious veneration. Now, in every country where there had been any religion at all
that is true, the great fact has come out very plainly, that the people who don't know
anything about true religion, have always been the most careful about the forms. Do you
want to know the man who used to swallow widows' houses, and devour the patrimonies of the
fatherless? Do you want to know the hypocrites, the deceivers, in the days of Christ? Why,
they were the Pharisees, who "for a show made long prayers;" they were the men
who gave alms to the poor in the corners of the streetthe men that tithed the anise,
and the mint, and the cummin, and forgot the weightier matters of the law, such as justice
and righteousness. If you wanted to find the seducer, the unjust judge, the liar, the
perjured man, in the days of Christ, you had only to ask for the man who had fasted thrice
in the week, and gave tithes of all he possessed. These Pharisees would do any wicked
action, and never stick at it; yet if in drinking wine a small gnat should have fallen in
and been swallowed with it, they would have considered themselves defiled, because their
law did not allow them to eat a creature from which the blood had not been withdrawn. Thus
they strained at the gnat, thus getting the reputation of being very religious, and
swallowed the camel, hump and all. You smile; but what they did in their day is done now.
You know the Romanists; did you ever know one of them who would not think it to be a very
high offence against the Majesty of Heaven, if he were to eat any meat on Good Friday? Do
you know anyone of them who did not think it necessary to keep Lent with strict
punctilious observance? Notice how carefully they go to their places of worship on the
Sabbath morning, how diligently they observe that sacred rite of crossing their foreheads
with holy water. How necessary is it, that the holy water and everything else of the same
kind, should be tenderly cared for. And do not the same persons in their own countries
keep their theatres open on the Sabbath day? Do you not find the very men, who are so
solemnly observant of their religion in the morning, forgetting it all in the evening;
thinking no more of the Sabbath, which they call holy, than if it were any other day, but
making it more a day of merriment than any day of the week? Look again at our Church of
England; God be thanked that there are so many true Evangelical men in the midst of it;
but there are certain sections there to whom my remarks will apply. Do you want to know
the men who know nothing at all about the new birth, who do not know what it is to be
justified by faith, who have not a spark of religion? Do you know where to find them? They
are the men that never said their creed without turning their heads the right way, that
never said the name of Jesus without bowing their heads most reverently; they are the men
who always take care that the church should be builded so as to be a goodly edifice, in
order that the parishioners going there may see the glory of God in the glory of his
house; they are the people who mark every red letter day, who take care that every rubric
is attended to, who think that holly on Christmas is a most heavenly thing, and a few
flowers upon the altar almost equal to the Lily of the Valley and the Rose of Sharon.
These are the gentlemen who could no more preach without a cassock than they could live
without a head. Of course they have not any religion at all, and because the inner life is
clean gone, evaporated, dissipated, they have to be so extremely particular that they
observe the outward form of it. I know many Evangelical Churchmen (and they are generally
precise enough) that would break through every form. I could point you out this morning
some two or three clergymen of the Church of England who are heretical enough to be
sitting here and listening to the words of one who is a Dissenter, and of course a
Schismatic, but who would no more think of calling me a Schismatic than they would think
of flying, and would give me the right hand of fellowship with all their hearts. I believe
that many of them would forget the rubrics if they could, and, if it were in their power,
would cut their catechism all to pieces, and turn half of their church prayer-book out of
doors. And these are the men that have most religion; they care least about the form but
they have most of the grace within; they have more true religion, more evangelism, more of
the grace of God in their hearts, than fifty of their Puseyite brethren.
But let me come to Dissenters, for we are just as bad. I must deal with all alike. We have
among us a certain class of people, a sort of dissenting Puseyites, Where the Puseyite
thinks it necessary to keep Good Friday and Easter Sunday, these good brethren take as
much care to keep holy day the wrong way, as the others the right way. They think it would
be a grievous sin to go to chapel on Good Friday, and they are solemnly in earnest that
they should never break the law of the church not to observe holy days. To them it is a
very sacred thing that they should always be found in their chapel twice on the Sunday;
they think it highly necessary that they should have their children baptized, or that they
should be baptized themselves, and that they should take the Lord's Supper. That is all
well and good; but alas! we must confess it, there are some among us who, if they are
orthodox in their opinions and precise in their outward practice, are quite content to be
utterly destitute of the power of religion. I must deal faithfully with all. I know in all
our dissenting denominations there are to be found many self-righteous persons, who have
not any religion at all, but who are the most precise people in all the world to stick up
for the outward form of it. Do you not know some old member of the church here and there?
Well, you say, if anybody in the church is a hypocrite, I should say old So-and-so is one.
If you were to propose any alteration in anything, oh! how these gentlemen would bristle
up; how they would draw their swords. They! they love every nail in the chapel door, they
would not have a different colour for the pulpit for the world. They will have everything
strictly observed. Their whole salvation seems to depend upon the rightness of the form.
Oh no, not they; they could not think of altering may of the forms of their church. You
know it is quite as easy for a man to trust in ceremonials, when the are severely simple,
as for a man to rely upon them with they are gorgeous and superb. A man may as much trust
in the simple ordinance of immersion and the breaking of bread, as another may trust in
the high mass and in the prayers of priests. We man have Rome in Dissent, and Rome in the
Church of England, and Rome anywhere; for wherever there is a trust in ceremonies, there
is the essence of Popery, there is anti-Christ and the man of sin. Oh! take heed of this
any of you who have been relying upon your ceremonies. This is just the truth, that the
more zeal for ceremonies, generally the less power of vital godliness within. But now, how
is it that the man who would not eat anything but salt-fish on Good Friday, cheats his
neighbour on Saturday? How is it that the man who never would by any means go to anything
but an orthodox sixteen-ounces-to-the-pound Baptist Chapel, can be found committing acts
of injustice in his daily business, and perhaps more filthy deeds still? I will tell you,
the man feels he must have some righteousness or other, and when he knows himself to be a
good-for-nothing rascal, he feels he has not got a moral righteousness, and therefore he
tries to get a ceremonial one. Mark the man that drinks and swears, that commits all kinds
of iniquity, and you will very often find him (I have known such cases) the most
superstitiously reverent man that can be found. He would not go inside a place of worship
without taking off his hat immediately. He will curse and swear outside, perhaps, and it
never pricks his conscience; but to walk up the aisle of a church with his hat onoh!
how frightful. He feels, if he did so, he would be lost for ever. He would not forget to
tithe the mint, anise, and cummin, but all the while the weightier matters of the law are
left totally unregarded. Another reason is, because a religion of ceremonies is so much
easier than true religion. To say Ava Maria and Pater Nosters is easy
enough; you may soon get it over, and it does not check the conscience much. To go to
chapel twice on the Sundaythere is nothing very hard in that. It is not half so hard
as turning to the Lord with full purpose of heart. It is not half so hard as breaking off
one's sin by righteousness, and putting one's trust in Christ Jesus alone. Therefore,
because the thing is so easy, people like it better. Again it is so complimentary. When
the Romanist beasts his back, and flogs his flesh, why is it that he likes that better
than the simple gospel, "Believe and live?" Why, because it just flatters his
pride. He thinks he is beating the devil out of himself, but he is in reality beating him
inthe devil of pride is coming in. He whispers, "Ah! you are a good man to have
flogged yourself like that! you will carry yourself to heaven by the merit of your wounds
and bruises." Poor human nature always like that. In fact, the more exacting a
religion is, the better people like it. The more religion ties you up, and binds you, if
it does not touch the heart, the better people like to carry it out. Hindooism has its
great hold upon the people, because they can get a great stock of merit by walking with
spikes in their shoes; or rolling themselves many thousands of miles, or drinking the
filthy waters of the Ganges, or offering themselves to die. All these things please human
nature. "Believe and live" is too humbling; to trust alone in Christ casts down
man's high looks; therefore man says, "Away with it!" and he turns to anything
rather than to Christ.
Besides, there is another reason. Men always like the religion of ceremonies, because it
does not need the giving up of their favourite sins. "Why", says a man, "if
all that is needed for me to be saved, is to have the Sacrament given me by the priest
when I come to die, what a delightful religion that is! I can drink, swear, and do just as
I like. I have nothing to do but to get greased at last with holy oil, and off I go to
heaven with all my sins about me." Says another, "We can have all our gaieties
and frivolities, all the pomp of life and the pride of flesh; all that we need is to get
confirmed; then, afterwards, sometimes to go to church, take a handsomely bound
prayer-book and Bible, be very attentive and observant, and the bishop will no doubt set
us all right." This just suits many men, because there is no trouble about it. They
can keep on with their gaieties and with their sins, and yet they believe they can go to
heaven with them. Men do not like that old-fashioned gospel which tells them that sin and
the sinner must part, or else they must be damned. They do not like to be told that
without holiness no man shall see the Lord, and that old-fashioned text, "Except a
man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God," will never be palatable to
human nature. Human nature does not mind what you tell it to do, so long as you do not
tell it what to believe. You may tell it to observe this, that, and the other, and the man
will do it, and thank you , and the harder it is, the better he will like you; but once
tell him, "Jesus Christ came into the world to save sinners. Believe on him and thou
shalt be saved," his pride is all up at once; he cannot endure it, and he hates the
man that preaches it to him, and drives the very thought of the gospel from his soul.
III. And now, in the last place, it is mine to warn you that TO TRUST IN CEREMONIES IS A
MOST DECEITFUL THING, AND WILL END IN THE MOST TERIFFIC CONSEQUENCES. When these people
had got the ark into the camp, they shouted for joy , because they thought themselves
quite safe; but, alas, they met with a greater defeat than before. Only four thousand men
had been killed in the first battle, but in the second, thirty thousand footmen of Israel
fell down dead. How vain are the hopes that men build upon their good works, and
ceremonial observances! How frightful is that delusion which teaches for the gospel a
thing which is not "the gospel," nor "another gospel;" but it is a
thing that would pervert the gospel of Christ. My hearer, let me ask thee solemnly, what
is thy ground of hope? Dost thou rely on baptism? O man, how foolish art thou! What can a
few drops of water, put upon an infant's forehead, do? Some lying hypocrites tell us that
children are regenerated by drops of water. What kind of regeneration is that? We have
seen people hanged that were regenerated in this fashion. There have been men that have
lived all their lives whoremongers, adulterers, thieves, and murderers, who have been
regenerated in their baptism by that kind of regeneration. Oh, be not deceived by a
regeneration so absurd, so palpable even to flesh and blood, as one of the lying wonders
that have come from hell itself. But mayhap thou sayest, "Sir, I rely upon my
baptism, in after life." Ah, my friends, what can washing in water do? As the Lord
liveth, if thou trusteth in baptism thou trusteth in a thing that will fail thee at last.
For what is washing in water, unless it is preceded by faith and repentance? We baptize
you, not in order to wash away your sins, but because we believe they are washed away
beforehand; and if we did not think you believed so, we would not admit you to
participation in that ordinance. But if you will pervert this to your own destruction, by
trusting in it, take heed; you are warned this morning. For as "circumcision availeth
nothing, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature," so baptism availeth nothing.
I may have some here who are saying within themselves, "Well, if I do not go to
heaven, nobody will, for I have been brought up to my church as regularly as possible; I
was regularly confirmed; my godfathers and godmothers stood for me in my childhood, and
all after the right fashion. I have come here, it is true, but it is about the first
offence I ever committed, coming into this Schismatic conventicle; if it please God to
forgive, I will never do so again. I always go to church, and I have no doubt that by
taking the Sacrament and saying my prayers I shall go to heaven." Ah! you are awfully
deceived, for unless you are born again you must come back to the old standard after
allunless you are in blessed union with the Lamb, unless you have found repentance
for sin, unless you have true living faith in the Lord Jesus, you may keep all these
things, you may observe every jot and tittle, but the gates of heaven must be shut in your
face, and "depart from me, I never knew you," must be your doom, even though you
reply, "Thou hast eaten and drunk in our streets, and we have listened to thy
voice." No, my friends, be ye Presbyterians, Episcopalians, or Dissenters, it matters
not, ye have your ceremonies; and there are some among us that rely upon them. This one
truth cuts at the root of us all. If this be our hope, it is a foul delusion. We just have
faith in Jesus, we must have the new heart and the right spirit; no outward forms can make
us clean. The leprosy lies deep within; and unless there be an inward work, no outward
work can ever satisfy God, and give us an entrance into Paradise.
But before I close, there is one thing I want you to notice, and that is, that this ark
not only could not give victory to Israel, but it could not preserve the lives of the
priests themselves who carried it. This is a fatal blow to all who trust in the forms
of religion. What would the Romanist think, if I should tell him that his outward forms
can never save him; and how would he grind his teeth if I were to tell him, as I do, that
the outward forms can never save his priest, for his priest and he must be lost together
unless they have some better trust than this! But we have even in Protestant churches too
much priestcraft. People say, "Well, if the Gospel does not save me, I am confident
of the salvation of my minister." Rest assured that he that serveth at God's altar is
no more secure from destruction, unless he hath a living faith in Christ, than you
yourselves. Hophni and Phinehas are slain, and so must every priest be if he relies on
ceremonies himself or teaches others to do so. I cannot imagine a more frightful death-bed
than that of a man who has been a priestI mean a man who has taught others to trust
in ceremonies. When he is buried, it will be said of him that he died in sure and certain
hope of a blessed resurrection; but oh! the moment after death, when he opens his eyes to
see his delusion! while he was on earth he was fool enough to think that drops of water
could save him, that a piece of bread and a cup of wine could renew his heart, and save
his soul, but when he gets into another world he will lose this folly, and then will the
thought flash upon him, like a lightning flash, writhing his soul with miseryAh! I
am destitute of the one thing needful; I had no love to Christ, I never had that
repentance which needed not to be repented of; I never fled to Jesus, and now I know that
that hymn is true
"Not all the outward forms on
earth,
Nor rites that God has given,
Nor will of man, nor blood, nor birth,
Can raise the soul to heaven."
Oh! how frightful then afterwards to
meet his parishioners, to see those to whom he had preached, and to be howled at through
the pit by men whom he was the instrument of destroying, by telling them to trust in a
rotten foundation. Let me free myself from any such fear as that. As the Lord my God
liveth before whom I stand this dayman, woman, my brother, my sister, in the race of
Adam, if thou reliest on anything short of the blood of Jesus Christ, thou trustest in a
lie; and if thy salvation ends in anything short of a thorough change of heart, if it
makes thee anything less than a new creature in Christ Jesus,the bed is shorter than a man
can stretch himself upon it, thou hast a religion which is not equal to the necessities of
thy case, and when thou needest it most, it will reel beneath thy feet and leave thee
without a standing place whereon to rest, overwhelmed with dismay and overcome by dispair.
Now, before I send you away, let me make this last remark. I hear one say, "Sir, I
renounce all trust in good works and ceremonies. Tell me how can I be saved?" The way
is simply this. Our sins deserve punishment; God must and will punish sin; Jesus Christ
came into this world and was punished in the room, place, and stead of all that believe on
him. Your business, then, this morning is to make this inquiry, Do I want a Savior? Do I
feel that I want him? And my business, if you answer that question aright is to say,
Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ with all thy heart, and thou shalt be saved.
Al! there is one in heaven to-day, I firmly believe, who was always a worshipper in this
place, and at New Park Streeta young man who was led here to listen to the gospel,
and was converted to God; and last Sabbath morning was caught away to heaven in the
burning house at Bloomsburyone of those young men who was taken out of the ruins,
one who had been brought to a knowledge of the truth here. It is stated in some of the
papers, that his mother was far from a religious woman, and was somewhat given to drink;
he had to struggle with some temptation and opposition, but he was enabled to hold on his
way, and then, in such an hour as he thought not, the Son of Man came for him, and caught
him to himself in the midst of flames and crashing timbers and the uprising of smoke. Oh!
I may have one here, that, ere another Sabbath morning comes, may be launched into
eternity, if not by the same deplorable process, yet in as hasty a manner; and as my soul
rejoices over that young man, to think that God should have honoured me in bringing him to
Christ before he took him up to heaven, I must lament that there are any of you in a peril
so frightful, as to be living without God, without Christ, without a hope of heaven; to
have death hanging over you, and yet not to tremble at it. Oh! this morning I beseech you,
close with Christ. "Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, while
his wrath is kindled but a little: for blessed are all they that put their trust in
him."
The Reformed Reader Home Page
Copyright 1999, The Reformed Reader, All Rights Reserved |