|
CHAPTER II.
SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE.
We find ourselves in a world where we
have no continuing abode. Within us, and without us, we have proofs and admonitions that
our chief interests lie in another world, and that our chief business in this is to
prepare for the future state, into which we shall very soon enter. We need information
respecting that unseen world and the right method of preparing for it, and no other
knowledge can be so important to us as this. Can it be that we have no means of acquiring
it? For our guidance in the things of this world, every necessary provision has been made.
We possess eyes; and the world in which we are placed affords the light that is needed to
tender them useful in directing our steps. We possess understanding; and means of
knowledge from without are presented, by which we may select the objects of our pursuits,
and the best methods of gaining them. We may hence infer that some means of knowledge
respecting our highest interests must exist. The sources from which this knowledge may be
obtained, are the following:
1. Our moral and religious feelings.---Brute animals have instincts by which they
are guided; and in man, also, instinctive propensities exist, adapted to his nature and
the condition and circumstances of his being. Maternal affection is not confined to brutes
as an instinct peculiar to them, but it is found in the highest degree in the human
mother; and in her breast, mingles with moral and religious feelings peculiar to human
nature and inseparable from it. The human mother feels the moral obligation to take care
of her child, antecedent to all reasoning on the subject. When we determine what is right
or wrong by a process of reasoning, we judge according to some law, or rule of right; but,
in this case, the mother is a law to herself. She needs no teaching from without, to
inform her that it is her duty to take care of her offspring. Sin may so debase human
nature, that mothers may evince no moral feeling; but, however it may be buried under our
corruptions, the moral principle is an element of our nature. Because of it, even the
heathen are a law unto themselves, and show the work of the law written in their hearts.
The moral feeling which at first co-operates with the mother's instinctive affection to
induce her to take care of her child, co-operates afterwards with her reason in devising
the best method of promoting its good.
When it was to be determined which of two women was the mother of a living child
claimed by both, the wisdom of Solomon decided, that the maternal relation existed where
maternal affection existed. On the same principle we may, from our moral and religious
feelings, infer our relation to moral government and to the Supreme Ruler. From this law,
written in the heart, we might obtain much religious knowledge, if the fall of man had not
obscured the writing.
2. The moral and religious feelings of our fellow-men.---We are formed for society,
and are capable of benefiting each other in the things of this life, and of that which is
to come. The judgments of others assist our judgments; and their moral and religious
feelings may, in like manner, assist ours. In the approbation or disapprobation of
mankind, we may find an important means of knowing what is right or wrong. Hence, it is a
rule of duty to do those things which are "of good report."
If an ancient writing is transmitted to us in numerous copies, all of which are
mutilated and greatly effaced, the probability of ascertaining what the original was is
far greater, when we compare many copies with each other, than it would be, if we
possessed one copy only. For the same reason, the moral and religious feeling of mankind
generally, is a source of knowledge more to be relied on, than that which is opened for
our examination in the moral nature of a single individual. A hardened transgressor's own
conscience may fail to reprove him, when his crimes shock the moral sense of the whole
company; and, from their disapprobation, he might learn the iniquity of his conduct,
though all moral feeling were extinguished in his own breast.
In examining this second source of knowledge, we observe the common consent of
mankind, that there is a God; that he ought to be worshipped; that there is a difference
between virtue and vice; that a moral government exists, which is partly administered in
this life by Divine Providence; that the soul of man is immortal; and that a future
retribution awaits all men after death. These truths of religion appear in the history of
mankind, through all the corruptions which have covered and obscured them.
3. The course of Nature.---Things are so arranged by the Creator and Ruler of the
world, that some actions tend to promote, and others to destroy, the happiness of the
individual and of society. By observing the tendency of actions, we may learn what to do
and what to avoid. God has established the nature of things, and the voice of Nature is
the voice of God. Conscience is God speaking within us, but, because of man's apostasy
from God, it often delivers false oracles. Hence, we do well to turn our ear to the voice
of God, speaking in universal Nature.
The tendency of vice to produce misery, is obvious to every one who observes the
curse of things around him. Drunkards and gamblers, impoverish themselves, ruin their
families, waste their health, and bring themselves to an untimely grave, not unfrequently
by violent, and sometimes, by suicidal hands. In ten thousand ways, crime of every species
exhibits its pernicious tendency, and, in this arrangement of things, the moral government
of God is clearly seen, and the conduct which he approves, is pointed out by the finger of
his Providence. Enough of God's moral government appears in the present life, to
demonstrate its existence; and the imperfection which is manifest in its present
administration, furnishes satisfactory proof that it extends beyond the present life, and
is perfected in the world to come.
The religious knowledge which may be obtained from the three sources which have
been enumerated, constitutes what is called Natural Religion. Though insufficient to meet
the wants of man in his fallen condition, it teaches the fundamental truths on which all
religion is based, and leads to the higher source of knowledge by which we may become wise
to salvation. That is
4. Divine Revelation.---Because all other means of knowledge are insufficient to
bring men to holiness and happiness, God has been pleased, in pity to our race, to make
known his will by special revelation. Besides his voice in conscience and in Nature, he
utters his voice from heaven. This revelation was anciently made by prophets, who were
commissioned to speak to men in his name, and afterwards by his Son from heaven. To us, in
this latter days, he speaks in his written word, the Bible, which is the perfect source of
religious knowledge, and the infallible standard of religious truth.
The Bible consists of two parts:--1. The Old Testament, or Hebrew Scriptures. This
is the book very carefully preserved by the Jews throughout the world, and held sacred by
them as a revelation from God. 2. The New Testament. This consists of various writings,
which have been carefully preserved by the Christians of past ages, and are now regarded
by them as a revelation from God, made through the immediate followers of Jesus Christ.
We shall here assume that the Bible is a revelation from God. If the reader has any
doubts on this point, he may study, to advantage, any of the numerous works extant on the
Evidences of Christianity; or, in the absence of more elaborate productions, he may read a
small tract by the Author, entitled The Origin and Authority of the Bible. [This Tract has
been introduced into the present work as an Appendix]
Inspiration and
transmission of the Scriptures.---The Bible, though a revelation from God, does not
come immediately from him to us who read it, but is received through the medium of human
agency. It is an important question, whether its truth and authority are impaired by
passing through this medium. Human authority was employed in the first writing of the
Scriptures, and agency was employed in the first writing of the Scriptures, and afterwards
in transmitting them, by means of copies and translations, to distant places, and
succeeding generations.
The men who originally wrote the Holy Scriptures, performed the work under the
influence of the Holy Spirit. Such was the extent of this influence, that the writing,
when it came forth from their hands, was said to be given by inspiration of God. So Paul
said, with special reference to the Old Testament: "All Scripture is given by
inspiration of God, and is profitable . . . that the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly
furnished unto good works."[1]
Though Moses and the prophets executed the writing, it is said to have been given by God,
and the perfection attributed to it demonstrates that it had not suffered by the
instrumentality which he had chosen to employ. Christ referred to the Hebrew Scriptures,
as the word of God.[2] Paul
represents what was spoken by the prophets, as spoken by God.[3] Peter attributes to the writings of Paul equal
authority with that of the Old Testament Scriptures.[4]
Paul also claims equal authority for what he spoke and wrote.[5] Christ promised to his apostles, after his
departure, the gift of the Holy Spirit, and described the effect of his influence on them
in these words: "It is not ye that speak, but the Spirit of your father which
speaketh in you."[6] This gift
of the Holy Spirit was poured out upon them on the day of Pentecost; and their possession
of it was proved by their power to speak with tongues, and work miracles. From all this,
we learn that what was spoken and written by inspiration, came with as high authority as
if it had proceeded from God without the use of human instrumentality. While Peter said to
the lame man, "In the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, rise up, and walk,"[7] the voice which spoke was Peter's,
but the power which restored the ankle bones was God's. The words, though Peter's, were
spoken under divine influence, or the divine power would not have accompanied them. So the
gospel, received from the lips of the apostles, was received, "not as the word of
men, but as it is in truth the word of God."[8]
The men who spoke and wrote as they were moved by the Holy Ghost, were the instruments
that God used to speak and write his word. Their peculiarities of thought, feeling, and
style, had no more effect to prevent what they spoke and wrote from being the word of God,
than their peculiarities of voice or of chirography.
The question, whether inspiration extended to the very words of revelation, as well
as to the thoughts and reasonings, is answered by Paul: "We preach, not in the words
which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth."[9] The thoughts and reasonings in the minds of the
inspired writers, were not a revelation to others until they were expressed in words; and
if the Holy Spirit's influence ceased before expression was given to these thoughts and
reasonings, he has not made a revelation to mankind. On this supposition, we cannot read
the Bible as the word of God, but as the word of men; of good and honest men, it is true,
but nevertheless of fallible men. The opinion that the expression is merely human,
undermines the confidence with which the word of God deserves to be regarded; because we
know not when, or how far, that expression may fail to convey the meaning of the Holy
Spirit. It can no longer be said, that the Scriptures are "a more sure word of
prophecy,"[10] that "they
cannot be broken,"[11] and
that the things written "are the commandments of the Lord."[12]
The doctrine of plenary inspiration, if properly understood, does not imply that
the Holy Spirit employed the writer as an unconscious instrument. It maintains that his
memory, and other mental powers, were employed in the execution of the work, as truly as
his hand; but it insists that the latter was as certainly controlled by the unerring guide
as the former. Nor does the doctrine imply, that the Holy Spirit is the original author of
every word contained in the sacred volume. It records the speeches of Satan, and of the
Orator Tertullus, and records them faithfully; but the Holy Spirit was not the author of
these speeches.
In 1 Cor. ch 7, Paul distinguishes between what he delivered, as a commandment of
the Lord, and what he spoke without such commandment. It may appear, at first view, that
he disclaims inspiration with regard to the things of the last kind. But if it be
admitted, that these things were matters of human advice with out divine authority, it
does not follow, that the writing which contains his advice, is uninspired. The inspired
word which records the speeches of Satan and Tertullus, may record the prudent counsel of
a wise apostle, even when that counsel does not come with the full sanction of divine
authority. But, in giving this counsel, Paul says, "I think that I have the Spirit of
God," v. 40; and, if he thought that he gave it by the Spirit, it would be rash in us
to think otherwise. We are not to understand the word "think," as implying doubt
in Paul's mind, and we need have no doubt that the counsel which he gave, was by the
wisdom from above.
Although the Scriptures were originally penned under the unerring guidance of the
Holy Spirit, it does not follow, that a continued miracle has been wrought to preserve
them from all error in transcribing. On the contrary, we know that manuscripts differ from
each other; and where readings are various, but one of them can be correct. A miracle was
needed in the original production of the Scriptures; and, accordingly , a miracle was
wrought; but the preservation of the inspired word, in as much perfection as was necessary
to answer the purpose for which it was given, did not require a miracle, and accordingly
it was committed to the providence of God. Yet the providence which has preserved the
divine oracles, has been special and remarkable. They were at first committed to the Jews,
who exercised the utmost care in their preservation and correct transmission. After the
Christian Scriptures were added, manuscript copies were greatly multiplied; many versions
were prepared in other languages; innumerable quotations were made by the early fathers;
and sects arose which, in their controversies with each other, appealed to the sacred
writings, and guarded their purity with incessant vigilance. The consequence is, that,
although the various readings found in the existing manuscripts, are numerous, we are
able, in every case, to determine the correct reading, so far as is necessary for the
establishment of our faith, or the direction of our practice in every important
particular. So little, after all, do the copies differ from each other, that these minute
differences, when in contrast with their agreement, render the fact of that agreement the
more impressive, and may be said to serve practically, rather to increase, than impair our
confidence in their general correctness. Their utmost deviations do not change the
direction of the line of truth; and if they seem in some points to widen that line a very
little, the path that lies between their widest boundaries, is too narrow to permit us to
stray. As copies of the Holy Scriptures, though made by fallible hands, are sufficient for
our guidance in the study of divine truth; so translations, though made with uninspired
human skill, are sufficient for those who have not access to the inspired original.
Unlearned men will not be held accountable for a degree of light beyond what is granted to
them; and the benevolence of God in making revelation, has not endowed all with the gifts
of interpreting tongues. When this gift was miraculously bestowed in ancient times, it was
for the edification of all: and now, when conferred in the ordinary course of providence,
the purpose of conferring it is the same. God has seen it wiser and better to leave the
members of Christ to feel the necessity of mutual sympathy and dependence, than to bestow
every gift on every individual. He has bestowed the knowledge necessary for the
translations with which the common people are favored, is full of divine truth, and able
to make wise to salvation.
A full conviction that the Bible is the word of God, is necessary to give us
confidence in its teachings, and with respect for its decisions. With this conviction
pervading the mind when we read the sacred pages, we realize that God is speaking to us,
and when we feel the truth take hold of our hearts, we know that it is God which whom we
have to do. When we study its precepts, all our powers bow to them, as the undoubted will
of our sovereign Lord; and when we are cheered and sustained by its consolations, we
receive them as blessings poured down from the eternal throne. Nature and science offer no
light that can guide us in our search for immortal bliss; but God has given us the Bible,
as a lamp to our feet, and a light to our path. Let us receive the gift with gratitude and
commit ourselves to its guidance.
[1] 2 Tim iii. 16, 17.
[2] Mark vii. 13.
[3] Heb i. 1.
[4] 2 Peter iii. 16.
[5] 1 Cor. xiv. 37; 1 Thess. iii.10.
[6] Matt x. 20.
[7] Acts iii. 6.
[8] 1 Thess. ii 13.
[9] 1 Cor. ii. 13.
[10] 2 Peter i. 19.
[11] John x. 35.
[12] 1 Cor. xiv. 37.
The Reformed Reader Home Page
Copyright 1999, The Reformed Reader, All Rights Reserved |